Feedback for my reviews...

[SirBaron]

Seeing as no one say's anything but great job! It's kind of hard to get feedback on anything i do .

For games i am thinking of doing a game setting comparison like 3-4 pages of different settings and how the effect the game image quality wise (with perhaps a FPS % hit too).

For the example i am going to use Gears of War because i was too lazy to load anything else up .

http://www.geforce3d.net/index/node/81

Here we go, those where quick images (as you can tell by the fact the camera is slightly changed in the first shot).

Soooo would you like me to expand on this feature or not? I am already using it on unreleased content, but it's more simple (in the sense it's overall settings and not individual)

[Cjl64]

Sounds great to me.... just don't burn yourself out on the reviews!

[SirBaron]

Sounds great to me.... just don't burn yourself out on the reviews!

Believe me doing these things are far more enjoyable and far less work involved than benchmarking . Nothing worse than playing the same 2 mins of a game 100 times .

[SirBaron]

Forgot to mention that i will probably be doing the same with the graphs. Rather than splitting them in half i can fit more stuff into them and then the image alternates into the SLI graph and back to normal etc.

Or i could do the same as now but have Resolutions instead of AA/AF and then alterante the graph picture between AA/AF levels.

Javascript FTW!

[Cjl64]

i really like the transition in the images... again great work... this adds even more interaction and depth to your reviews

[Uber_Tiny]

Well, as you already know I love the image transition.

But if you want to use it for graphs then we need to ad on a back and forward button to allow users to switch. Shouldn't be a hard thing to implement.

[VW_Factor]

I know I mentioned something about this before, however I think it made a little bit of sense at the very least. The OC'ing benchmarks for games. Perhaps there should be a seperate article for overclocking performance, and the review should focus more on the games "stock" or out of the box performance with certain hardwares..

Then sometime later, maybe write a review of the game not so much a review, but focused on merely the OC'ing performance.

Perhaps would lessen the work load a bit to get turn around time on the articles/reviews quicker.

[SirBaron]

I know I mentioned something about this before, however I think it made a little bit of sense at the very least. The OC'ing benchmarks for games. Perhaps there should be a seperate article for overclocking performance, and the review should focus more on the games "stock" or out of the box performance with certain hardwares..

Then sometime later, maybe write a review of the game not so much a review, but focused on merely the OC'ing performance.

Perhaps would lessen the work load a bit to get turn around time on the articles/reviews quicker.

Already delt with in the thread you posted in, OC'ing is staying .

To quote my self..

It's because i like to show people what is the limiting factor in games, either CPU or GPU.

If a game increases in performance with CPU overclocks then it is CPU limited and people know that they will need a good CPU, or a overclock to get the most out of this game, not only that SLI is REALLY CPU limited so people can see how SLI reacts to the overclocks.

GPU is pretty obvious and i feel i do not have to explain that one.

Personally i like to keep everything in one article, making a 2 page article for overclocking is a bit on the extreme side , not only that it's a bit silly.

[Uber_Tiny]

I know I mentioned something about this before, however I think it made a little bit of sense at the very least. The OC'ing benchmarks for games. Perhaps there should be a seperate article for overclocking performance, and the review should focus more on the games "stock" or out of the box performance with certain hardwares..

Then sometime later, maybe write a review of the game not so much a review, but focused on merely the OC'ing performance.

Perhaps would lessen the work load a bit to get turn around time on the articles/reviews quicker.

Turn around times on the reviews of the games depends on the fact of if we have the game or not. Doing a review on a beta or demo doesn't really make for a proper review. Splitting the review up into 2 separate topics doesn't make any since either. Why make more clicks for one topic. I'm not sure I understand your issue with having more content in one review. To me the more the info the better. I mean if you don't want to read it than by all means you can just go on to the next page. But I do have to say that we are still growing and things do change. We can always look at changing up the reviews to better them for our readers.

At least we have them, and at least they are very detailed ones at that. I think that makes us unique and that's what we would rather be.

[VW_Factor]

I just saw it as a way to lessen work load, and increase turn around time.

[Uber_Tiny]

I just saw it as a way to lessen work load, and increase turn around time.

That makes sense